The question of
income tax is a thorny one. On one hand everybody hates it, but on the other, no one seriously challenging CONSIDERS it. It?s like gravity. We simply accept it as if it were a law of nature.
Well it should be challenged, and here?s why. To avoid income tax by whatever legal means possible is entirely moral. And the reason lies in understanding exactly what income tax is, and what it is based on. To tax a person?s income is to tax that person?s life. For consider this: when you work you expend time and energy. You devote forty or more hours each week of your life to trading your life?s time and energy for money. That money is a tradeoff Therefore for the time and energy you put in.If the government takes 25% of that money as tax, then it is actually taxing your life at the rate of 25%, and saying state in effect that one quarter of your life belongs to the. And if the government takes 50% of your money in tax (as the UK government has just announced as of writing), then 50% of your life has been commandeered by the state.
In order to make this point as clear as possible, consider the plight of black slaves in the early days of America. A slave was someone who did not own his life. His labor was expropriated by the slave owner. Given this situation, you could consider the slave?s income tax rate to be around 80% ? with the remaining 20% ??being taken off him as the cost of food and boardSo if having to tax rate is 80%. slavery ? where one?s whole life is bound up with a slave master ? then certainly having to income tax rate of 30% or 50% equates to exactly that same percentage of slavery. Given a choice of being a slave or a 100% 50% slave, you may opt for the Latter, but it would hardly be moral.
To tax income is to tax one?s life. The higher the tax rate, the higher the claim on one?s life. And no matter what percentage of income tax is levied, it represents a percentage of ?slavery?. It?s like the old story of boiling a frog in water slowly, so it does not realize it?s being boiled to death. The long suffering tax payer is just like the frog -. Being fleeced and enslaved by degreeAt what point does
was a self-respecting person up and say ?No!?? Should he accept a 25% rate quietly, but get agitated when the rate creeps up to 40%? Should the long-suffering tax payer only complain when it reaches 50%? And if not, at what point does anyone stand up and say ?Enough is enough!?
The truth is, no matter what percentage, income tax is a tax on one?s life. The more tax, the more a person?s life is enslaved. Apart from the moral argument against tax investigation, there are compelling practical arguments so. As already stated effort to income tax is a levy on one?s own. And as it acts as a disincentive seeking to work. Just ask yourself the question ? at what rate of tax do you start losing the will to work? And if the tax rates were lowered Considerably, would not you work harder, knowing you were keeping more of your own money? This fact is well known of course, and high-taxing countries are forever suffering a ? brain drain ?as the entrepreneurial class pack up their bags and head overseas to countries where their life and more money is their own.It?s not by sheer luck or coincidence that the Chinese work hard. It?s because countries seeking as Singapore, Hong Kong and China itself have very low income tax rates in comparison with other developed western countries.
As a resident of Singapore, for example, you are taxed at a rate of between zero and 20%, with 20% being the maximum. If you lived in Hong Kong you would be taxed a maximum of 15%. That?s a big difference. It does not take much thinking to realize that a worker in either of these two countries is going to be a whole lot better off than a high income earner under the new United Kingdom tax regime ? where the top rate is now 50%Income tax is both immoral and impractical, and when it gets out of control, it destroys the very basis of any thriving economy.. It also creates demand for creative accounting services, seeking to mitigate high taxes, and the demand for tax havens and offshore bank accounts -. Where a productive and hard-working person may seek some respite from the clutches of the tax man
So what?s the alternative
There are a number of systems that could be put in place to fund the activities of government ? all of Which would be better than on income tax. And here?s a few ideas just for starters.
Income tax could be replaced with sales tax act would have the effect of Eliminating the departments of inland revenue, abolishing the need for tax returns, and leaves every dollar of income in a person?s hands ? letting them decide what to spend it on
It could be replaced with a resident?s levy -. like a fee for services. This levy would be the same for everybody, and would be paid say once a year ? or even in installments. The critical thing here is that such a levy would be like any expense and become part of a person?s normal expenditure. And the great benefit of doing it this way would be that, unlike the income tax, Which is taken out at source, the paying of money would be examined by everyone noticed. And if the government were to get too greedy and increase the levy too much, then people would notice it and rise up to change the government.
Any system for raising government revenue would be preferable to the income tax. earn without it, people would get to keep what they. A massive bureaucracy could be dismantled. And a much more effective brake would be applied to spendthrift governments everywhere. id=?article-resource?> in the offshore world since 1998 and lives the Internationalist lifestyle he writes and advises about. He Operates a private information service for those seeking more personal and financial freedom, and offers a free introductory e-course called the Freedom shift, Which is available from: http://www.sovereignlife.comfree vacation certificates Free Slots hilton head bike rental movie animation